What the contract says and what the model shows are not always the same thing.
Legal documents and financial models live in separate worlds during due diligence. Lawyers read the contracts. Analysts read the model. Nobody checks whether the numbers in one match the language in the other.
Contract Inspector closes that gap. Diligenz AI™ extracts clause-level detail from every document in your data room and cross-references it against the corresponding values in your financial model — automatically, in real time.
Two documents. One deal. Zero reconciliation.
A share purchase agreement says the seller retains liability for environmental remediation up to a cap of $2M. The financial model has no provision for this. The legal team knows about the clause. The finance team does not. This happens on real transactions, regularly — not because either team is careless, but because no tool reads both documents and connects the dots. Until now.
Legal document
Environmental liability capped at $2M retained by seller.
Financial model reconciling…1 conflict
Working capital schedule carries no environmental contingency.
How Contract Inspector works.
Upload your data room
Share purchase agreements, disclosure letters, employment contracts, leases, IP assignments — Contract Inspector reads all of it.
Extract clause-level detail
Not a summary. The exact clause, with full context — what it requires, when it triggers, what it caps or excludes.
Cross-reference the model
Every clause is mapped against the corresponding model value. Discrepancies are flagged, missing provisions identified — one reconciled view.
The contradictions manual review cannot find at speed.
| The contract says… | The model shows… | Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Change-of-control clause triggers renegotiation of three key supplier contracts | Supplier costs held flat for 36 months post-acquisition | Discrepancy |
| Earn-out structure linked to EBITDA targets for 24 months post-close | No earn-out provision in the purchase price model | Missing |
| Environmental liability capped at $2M retained by seller | Zero environmental contingency in the working capital schedule | Missing |
| IP assignment excludes technology developed before 2019 | Full IP value attributed to pre-2019 technology portfolio | Overvalued |
Contract Inspector surfaces all four of these before you sign. Not after.
See what your current process is missing.
Use our integrated Diligenz Chatbot to ask high-level questions like “What is the primary driver of this quarter’s growth?” — and get an answer based on traced Excel antecedents.

